Cell Phones And Their Possession At School Essay - 1593 Words

Cell phones in schools Researchers show in today’s society that there is a higher rate of students having cell phones at school than in prior years. There are many pros and cons to children having cell phones in their possession at school. According to Maya Cohen, a 2010 Pew Research Center found that 65 percent of cell owning teens bring their phones to school despite any bans that may be in place. It is up to the child to know the rules and regulations when carrying a phone at school, and it is the parent’s responsibility to go over the rules of having a phone with their child. Although there are many different opinions amongst adults pertaining to children having cell phones at school, I think we all can agree that they are very necessary in today’s society. One of the biggest pros of allowing your child to carry their phone to school is knowing you will be able to have a constant line of communication. â€Å"Student use of cell phone is a new area of concern in today’s scho ols† (Humble 2011). For parents this is a very important factor in feeling secure in their everyday life. In today’s society, it is comforting for parents knowing that they have access to their child just by a press of a button. Cell phones have features such as location and security, this allows parents to see the exact location of their child throughout the course of the day. Initially, as a parent, the main concern for children is knowing that they are exactly where the need to be. Technology allowsShow MoreRelatedEssay Adolescents: Leave the Cell Phones At Home1676 Words   |  7 PagesPost inception of the cell phone has fueled a shift in the civility of adolescent social interaction. Gone are the days of seeing teenagers imaginatively playing alongside each other with the only restriction being his or her ability to effectively communicate. Virtual conversations, text messages and online social networks have replaced development of social skills through personal interactions. Some educators insist that cell phones provide a unique opportunity to capitalize on the learning experienceRead MorePros And Cons Of Teenage Cell Phone Use1023 Words   |  5 PagesPros and Cons of Teenage Cell Phone Use Cell phones have become a major part of people’s lives. They are probably one of the biggest inventions when it comes to communication because of the many functions that they are capable of performing. The use of cell phones has become especially popular among teens as it is a major part of teenage social life. One source states that â€Å"22 percent of children ages 6 to 9 own a cell phone; 60 percent of tweens ages 10 to 14 own a phone, and 84 percent of teensRead MoreCell Phones Should Not Be Banned from School Property693 Words   |  3 Pageslocal high school in the United States, they will be sure to see teenage students with their cellular telephones in hand. One may say the use of cell phones should be banned on school property, however there are many instances in which that may not be the best idea. Parents need to know that their children are safe and those children need a way in which to contact their parents if an emergency arises. If their child is not permitte d to have their cellular telephone with them at school, the parentRead MoreThe Effect Of Cell Phones On Teenager s Lives843 Words   |  4 PagesThe Effect of Cell Phones in Teenager’s Lives iPhone 5, 5s, 5c, 6, 6XL, Droid, Blackberry. The list of different cell phones that are in the possession of the teenage population across the world, is endless. The use of a cell phone especially in the teenage years, is almost like an addiction. This is mostly because of the endless possibilities having to do with a cell phone. Today cell phones are basically mobile computers at your fingertips. Within a second the Internet can be searched forRead MoreAn Argument Essay on the Use of Cell Phones in Public Places1105 Words   |  4 Pagesserge is the cellular telephone. Every individual with a cell phone has the ability to call any person, place, or agency at anytime as long as the individual is within the service providers coverage area. The prevalence of cell phone owners has increased the use of cell phones in public places, such as schools, restaurants, and theaters, and their use in public is associated with both positive and negative implications. Some argue cell phones sh ould be banned from public places because they are aRead MoreThe Cell Phone Education Regulation Act872 Words   |  4 Pagesagencies to determine legislative laws that are enforceable across the country. The Cell Phone Education Regulation Act created by Congress has the authority to develop laws regarding cell phone use in primary schools. As legislative powers cannot be transferred or delegated, was Congress proper in authorizing the Cellular Educational Service the power to enforce certain regulations through criminal penalties to primary school students or was this a violation of improper delegation of powers? By targetingRead More Wireless Technologies Essay1311 Words   |  6 Pageshigh schools, and elementary schools. With such a new and advanced technology taking the world by storm, there are many different forms of applications of the technology and devices that are heavily depended upon by the average person. With such a dependence on these devices today, there are safety precautions and security risks that must be taken into affect. One obvious wireless item that is widely used is the cell phone. Over the last decade, cell phones have goneRead MoreStudents And Their Technology Usage1485 Words   |  6 Pages Students and Their Technology Usage in the Classroom In the school system today, technology is one of the most powerful ways to get students to learn. Technology has helped keep students engaged and focused, while still keeping them entertained when learning. It has also given instant access to information that at one time was not easy to retrieve unless they went to the library. It has provided students and teachers with unlimited amounts of of information at their fingertips, enabling studentsRead MoreBenefits Of Cell Phones For Young Children882 Words   |  4 PagesAs today’s world has evolved with over 6 billion people having mobile phones; communication has become further of a necessity for older human beings. As parents, some do not grasp a reason for their young ones having a cell phone in their possession at all times. However, as parents more or less understand the necessity of their younger children having a form of communication to and from home. Having a cell phone in today’s society has become a modicum of what some perceive on an everyday basis,Read MoreCell Phones Have Become A Necessary Part Of Society928 Words   |  4 PagesCell phones have become a necessary part of society. At least any teenager will tell you so. Many Americans have cellular devices, but the main age group I’d say ranges from thirteen to twenty-five years old. These are the ones who depend on cell phones to communicate with others. Cell phones were originally created to be a phone you can use on the go to make calls instead of using a landline, however; these crazy devices have now added features such as calculators, alarm clocks and even note pads

Tuskegee Experiment Free Essays

Study clinicians â€Å" For the most part, doctors and civil servants simply did their jobs. Some merely followed orders, others worked for the glory of science. † — Dr John Heller, Director of the Public Health Service’s Division of Venereal Diseases[8] Some of the Tuskegee Study Group clinicians. We will write a custom essay sample on Tuskegee Experiment or any similar topic only for you Order Now Dr. Reginald D. James (third to right), a black physician involved with public health work in Macon County, was not directly involved in the study. Nurse Rivers is on the left. Dr. Taliaferro Clark Dr. Oliver WengerThe venereal disease section of the U. S. Public Health Service (PHS) formed a study group at its national headquarters. Dr. Taliaferro Clark was credited with its origin. His initial goal was to follow untreated syphilis in a group of black men for 6 to 9 months, and then follow up with a treatment phase. When he understood the intention of other study members to use deceptive practices, Dr. Clark disagreed with the plan to conduct an extended study. [clarification needed] He retired the year after the study began. Representing the PHS, Clark had solicited the participation of the Tuskegee Institute (a historically black college (HBCU) that was well-known in Alabama) and of the Arkansas regional PHS office. Dr. Eugene Dibble, an African American doctor, was head of the John Andrew Hospital at the Tuskegee Institute. Dr. Oliver C. Wenger, a caucasian, was director of the regional PHS Venereal Disease Clinic in Hot Springs, Arkansas. He and his staff took a lead in developing study procedures. Wenger and his staff played a critical role in developing early study protocols. Wenger continued to advise and assist the Tuskegee Study when it turned into a long-term, no-treatment observational study. [9] Dr. Raymond H. Vonderlehr was appointed on-site director of the research program and developed the policies that shaped the long-term follow-up section of the project. For example, he decided to gain the â€Å"consent† of the subjects for spinal taps (to look for signs of neurosyphilis) by depicting the diagnostic test as a â€Å"special free treatment†. Vonderlehr retired as head of the venereal disease section in 1943, shortly after penicillin had first been shown to be a cure for syphilis. Nurse Eunice Rivers, an African-American trained at Tuskegee Institute who worked at its affiliated John Andrew Hospital, was recruited at the start of the study. Dr. Vonderlehr was a strong advocate for her participation, as she was the direct link to the community. During the Great Depression of the 1930s, the Tuskegee Study began by offering lower class African Americans, who often could not afford health care, the chance to join â€Å"Miss Rivers’ Lodge†. Patients were to receive free physical examinations at Tuskegee University, free rides to and from the clinic, hot meals on examination days, and free treatment for minor ailments. As the study became long term, Nurse Rivers became the chief person with continuity. Unlike the changing state of national, regional and on-site PHS administrators, doctors, and researchers, Rivers stayed at Tuskegee University. She was the only study staff person to work with participants for the full 40 years. By the 1950s, Nurse Rivers had become pivotal to the study—her personal knowledge of the subjects enabled maintenance of long-term follow up. In the study’s later years, Dr. John R. Heller led the national division. By the late 1940s, doctors, hospitals and public health centers throughout the country routinely treated diagnosed syphilis with penicillin. In the period following World War II, the revelation of the Holocaust and related Nazi medical abuses brought about changes in international law. Western allies formulated the Nuremberg Code to protect the rights of research subjects. No one appeared to have reevaluated the protocols of the Tuskegee Study according to the new standards. In 1972 the Tuskegee Study was brought to public and national attention by a whistleblower, who gave information to the Washington Star and the New York Times. Heller of PHS still defended the ethics of the study, stating: â€Å"The men’s status did not warrant ethical debate. They were subjects, not patients; clinical material, not sick people. â€Å"[10] How to cite Tuskegee Experiment, Papers

Organic and Non-Organic Food Nutrients - myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theOrganic and Non-Organic Food Nutrients for Sweetners. Answer: Over last two decades, organic food has been the limelight of better food ingested by human being. Eventually, a vast number of people think that they are safer, tastier, and healthier than the non-organic food. Others argue that it is better for the environment and also the welfare of the animals. Regarding this, it is defined as a farming product grown by the use of natural fertilizer such as manure, and animals are reared organically, farmers tend not to give them any antibiotics, and any other drugs that boost their hormones. Conversely, non-organic food is produced with the aid of chemicals such the pesticides and preservatives. For food to be designated as organic, it should be artificially food additive free and natural. This necessitates artificial preservation, colouring, sweeteners, flavouring, and MSG (Monosodium Glutamate).Additionally, in organic farming farmers tends to conserve groundwater and upheave quality of the sand. As a result, it diminishes pollution which favo urs the environment. This essay accurately proof that organic foods are a better source of nutrition and their effect. Initially, organic foods contain more vitamins and antioxidants. According to multiple research done they tend to justify that natural food renders the highest level of micronutrient includes vitamin C, iron, and zinc and antioxidants. Furthermore, approximately 69% of antioxidants level are present in these foods, and remains to be a fact. According to Corporation, (2010), foods like berries and corns contain more than 58% of antioxidants and more than 52% of vitamin C. This concludes that reinstating non-organic with this foods will dilate more antioxidants in the viands. Polyphenol and Antioxidants make plants independent from pesticides since they are protective compound(MacKay, 2015). In all, consuming this food assists in the better well-being of human since it contains required micronutrients such as the vitamins and the antioxidants. Subsequently, with regard to non-organic foods, vitamins and antioxidants present are of less quantity as compared to organic food. Since they are sprayed with pesticides, which perform the same function as phytochemicals, which are produced by antioxidant that is important to both plants and human health (Wexler, 2015). These foods tend not to provide it because they are dependent on the chemicals. Furthermore, pesticides are also harmful to human health and act as food poisoning when ingested. Additionally, use of food additives reduces nutrients such as vitamin C, Irons (2, 3, 4, and 5), and Zinc. These nutrients are essential in human health and if they are absent immune system of a body is negatively affected (Haugen Musser, 2012). Chemicals found in these foods are bulking agent, starch, hydrogenated fats, and emulsifiers they cause various health disorder like cancer, stroke and high blood pressure. As a result, this kind of foods is not healthy to our health since they conta in more chemicals and fewer nutrients. Secondly, Organic foods like dairy and milk contain fattier acids. They may include a higher quantity of omega three fatty acids, vitamin E, Iron, and both carotenoid seven and nine. All these are important to human health, for instance, Omega three fatty acid plays a significant role in the development and average growth of the body, and healthy brain function(What is Organic Food, and is it Better Than Non-Organic? 2016). They also lessen the risk of heart disorder to an individual. Additionally, Fish oil is an example of Omega three, and it comprises of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids, which advocates in managing and preventing heart disease. According to Cacioppo, (2014) it also aids in reducing blood pressure and speculations of having a stoke. Vitamin E is an example of antioxidant rebuilding and protecting body tissues from radicle materials that are harmful to organs, tissues, and organs this is its primary function. Organic milk contains less iodine and selenium, and these two minerals are vital for health. Consequently, for one to maintain a good state of health one should assure that take organic dairy and milk since they contain nutrients that play a notable role in body subsistence. However, non-organic dairy and milk contain less fatty acids or sometimes they may lack this acid. The Less fatty acid in the body may lead to high risk of the organ not functioning as required? Such risks include amnesia, dementia, vision problem, skin and hair problems, and mood swings. Additionally, most of the patients who have Alzheimer's and diagnosed with ADHD have lower than the standard level of vital fatty acids concluding that they are taking in convenctional foods. According to Haugen Musser, (2012), there is no specific quantity of fatty acid in a diet, but it is recommended to take up to five to six percent of fat per day, on the contrary, this kind of food has less than five percent. Moreover, this proves to be harmful to health since it contains less amount of fatty acid (omega three fatty acids, vitamin E, Iron, and both carotenoid seven and nine.). As a result, health disorders are triggered by this diet, and some disease may evolve from it because for a body to pr otect its self-becomes more cumbersome since nutrient that performs this function are of less quantity. Thirdly, level of nitrates in organic food is generally low, which is medically amalgamated product thus makes it exceptional. The concentration of nitrate in this diet is less than thirty percent. The low rate of nitrate in the body remains to be less harmful to human health, and high level of it may increase the risk of specific disorders like cancer. When it is mixed with water, they are converted to nitric oxide which limits the risks of hypertension. Another function is that it can reverse or prevent chest pain, and angina triggered when the heart muscle does not get ample oxygen (Domazet Djoki?, 2018). Moreover, nitrate helps in making an amino acid, which in the process are required to make proteins. Talking of proteins, they are the primary component of the entire organ; it is used by the body to repair and reconstruct the worn out tissues. Also, it also assists in building hormones, enzymes, and other body chemicals that maintain the metabolic rate (Wrolstad, 2012). Consequ ently, this diet supplies low rate of nitrogen in the body which corps positively with it and nitrate oxide from nitrate helps in building other nutrients in the body to maintain its good state of health. However, in non-organic diet nitrates and nitrites are added to processed milk and meat like sausage, ham, hot dogs and bacon. They are us for preservatives as aiding in limiting bacterium effects and also adding flavour. This concludes that the amount of nitrate consumed is of higher quantity than the required Percentage, which is usually thirty percent. Furthermore, this renders increase risk of cancer in the digestive tracks and some to research they tend to justify this (In Cacioppo, 2014). A lot of nitrate in the body can lead to a dangerous condition known as methemoglobinemia, which is why nitrate applied to this diet should be regulated. As a result, it is clear that this kind of food contains an excess amount of nitrate that threatens human health but organic diet has a moderate amount which contributes hundred percent in organs. Lastly, organic food contains plant compound known as salicylic acid. It is a primary component of an inflammatory agent that reduces the risk of hardening of arteries, rheumatism and colon cancer which also mitigate death rate caused by heart attack. Evidently, useful chemistry decided to produce part of it and decided to name it aspirin. The original version is found in this diet. Compared to non-organic the nutrient is applied to it since it depends on the chemical for growth. These compounds are produced from the organic plant then are used in non-organic plants (Domazet Djoki?, 2018). Furthermore, they differ in the amount of fat present in the meat, for instance, a natural cow has a lower quality of fats while the non-organic cow has a high amount of fats. This is caused by direct injection of fats, carbohydrates, and hormones to boost their growth (Pico?, 2012). In all, organic will remain to have more nutrients than non-organic since they are naturally produces making health y to ingest. In conclusion, according to the research organic foods comprise all nutrients that help in maintaining healthy body function. Some nutrients help in sustaining body immune to fight diseases. Contrarily, the non-organic food contains a lot of chemicals than the nutrients. If an individual ingests it, high chances of them suffering from health disorders such as heart disorders, stroke, and reduced body immune. Before ingesting any food one should take note of what taken to reduce the risks. Unfortunately, there is evidence that proofs that organic food serves the primary function in maintaining human health while also proving the adverse effect of non-organic foods. Consequently, for a person to get required nutrients, one should avoid non-organic diet to reduce the low rate of taking in chemicals. References Are organic foods worth the price?. (2017).Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 22 October 2017, from https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/in-depth/organic-food/art-20043880 Centore, M. (2018). Organic foods. Broomall, PA : Mason Crest. Corporation, A. (2010).Does organic food contain more nutrients than non-organic food? - Health Wellbeing.Abc.net.au. Retrieved 22 October 2017, from https://www.abc.net.au/health/ talkinghealth/factbuster/stories/2010/07/07/2947475.htm Domazet, I., Djoki?, N. (2018, January 01). Food Safety From Consumer Perspective. Food Additives Nutrition - Nutrition, Function, Side Effects - NY Times Health Information. (2017).Nytimes.com. Retrieved 22 October 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/health/guides/nutrition/food-additives/overview.html Haugen, D. M., Musser, S. ( (2012)). Nutrition. Detroit:Greenhaven Press/Gale Cengage Learning. In Cacioppo, L. M. (2014). Food science research summaries. MacKay, J. (2015). Organic foods. Farmington Hills, Mich : Lucent Books. Omar SA, e. (2017).A comparison of organic and inorganic nitrates/nitrites. - PubMed - NCBI.Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 22 October 2017, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2 Pico?, Y. (2012). Chemical analysis of food: Techniques and applications. Academic Press. Vaughan, J. G., Judd, P. A. (2013). The Oxford book of health foods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. What is Organic Food, and is it Better Than Non-Organic?. (2016).Healthline. Retrieved 22 October 2017, from https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/what-is-organic-food#section2 Wexler, B. (2015). Barron's quick check guide to organic foods. Hauppauge, NY : Barron's Educational Series, Inc. Wrolstad, R. E. (2012). Food carbohydrate chemistry. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley-Blackwell.